7.022 The adoption of a binary code
to represent all sixteen mu biograms
of the da subset can be used to
generate both Schema Mu which
represents the eight-fold pre-Oedipal
path of being and Schema Mu'
which in turn depicts the Oedipal
eight-fold path of having


7.023 Bnnnnnnnnnound by Time alone, that which
accompanies the free floascendentally operating
Kantian unity of apperception

7.024 Bound now by such a passing stream
ever faceless and spaceless that whch passing events in the midst
of a sighting of

7.025 Tipatory thoug nnnnnnht of the

stream of the pleasure of fulfilling events
surfaces and floats free

7.026 Tinng passage though of such
satisfying events leads immediately
to the unpleasure of d-anamit

8.00 nnnnnnmnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

unpleasing events eventually leads to theghts of the things themselves
8.01 The anticipatory thought
of the {f}Other expressed within
the d-anatmoi mode marks in this
case a da driven turning of the
eight fold pre-Oedipal path of being

8.02 The accepting look of the
{f}Other results now in the adoption
of a da-like Self and re-introduces
the d-atmoi mode

8.03 A d-Littling withdrawal
of this look of acceptance
by some narcissistically self
favouring {f}Other results in
the recognition of the rejected
not good enough Self and leads
to the d-anatmoi mode

8.04 Repeated withdrawal of
this belittling look of acceptance by
by some d-Littling self-favouring
{f}Other and by it's transference
onto some sibling rival sidelines
the speaking subject then into
the d-Littled b-atmoi mode

8.05 Exposure rather to a
{f}Other's look of approving
acceptance results in the
adoption of the d-jivatmoi
mode and a Self that can
have what it takes "to be
it" for all {f}Others

8.06 Complete withdrawal
of this look of approval
by some domineering
{f}Other results then in
the d-anatmoi mode

8.061 Repeated withdrawal
of this look of approval by
some domineering {f}Other
and by it's transference onto
some sibling rival sidelines
the speaking subject into a
domineered b-atmoi mode

8.10 The pushing of some
far more tolerant {f}Other to
their limit inevitably results in
the loss of this look of accepting
approval and results in the
appearance of the b-anatmoi
mode and the triggering
of the relentless pursuit
of some locally available
all-embracing {f}Other

8.11 Alternatively b-anatmoi
individuals can double back
and enter the b-jivat' mode
through an identificatory
intolerant rejection
of the rejecting
{f}Other

8.114 All such b-jivat' mode
subjects upon returning
to such a rejecting
[f}Other following an
intolerant identificatory
d-atmoi inducing encounter
with some locally available
(m)Other figure round
upon their (in)tolerant
{f}Other in the form of
such a d-atmoi inducing
(m)Other figure and bed
down then into the
major b-jivat mode

8.115 Similarly with all returning
b-jivat' subjects that follow on from
an intolerant identificatory d-littling
or domineering b-atmoi inducing
encounter with some locally
available (m)Other figure
they too round upon their
(in)tolerant {f}Other in
the form of the b-atmoi
inducing(m)Other figure
upon their return and bed
down then into the
major d-jivat mode

8.116 Likewise with all returning
b-jivat' subjects that follow on from
an intolerant identificatory d-littling
or domineering d-anatmoi inducing
encounter with some locally
available (m)Other figure
they too round upon their
(in)tolerant {f}Other in
the form of the d-anatmoi
inducing (m)Other figure upon
their return and bed down
then into the major
b-jivatmoi mode

8.117 Those b-jivat' subjects
upon exposuree to yet another
b-anatmoi inducing encounter
with their locally available
(m)Other figure are no different
they too round upon their
(in)tolerant {f}Other in
the form of the intolerant
b-anatmoi inducing (m)Other
figure upon their return
and bed down then
into the major
d-jivatmoi mode

8.12 However if the withdrawal of
any look of approving  acceptance
is occasioned by the intrusion
of a more favoured (m)Other
then the b-anatmoi mode leads
straight onto the d-anatmoi' mode
and marks the point of entry
to the Oedipal eight-fold
path of having

8.13 The re-adoption of Self
in the context of the look of
preferential acceptance of
the favoured (m)Other
precipitates the
d-atmoi' mode

8.14 A d-Littling withdrawal of
this look of acceptance by some
self favouring narcissistic
(m)Other forces a return to
to the d-anatmoi' mode

8.15  Repeated withdrawal of this
belittling look of of acceptance by
by some d-Littling self-favouring
(m)Other or by it's transference
onto some sibling rival sidelines
the speaking subject into a
d-Littled b-atmoi' position

8.16 Alternatively if the
favoured (m)Other's look
of approving acceptance had
been won and lost in the blink
of a "castrating" eye then the
d-anatmoi' mode is entered

8.17  Repeated withdrawal of this
look of approving acceptance by
such a domineering (m)Other
and by it's transference onto
some sibling rival sidelines
the speaking subject
into a domineered
b-atmoi' position

8.18 The pushing of a far
more tolerant non-domineering
(m)Other to their limit likewise
results in the loss of this look of
approving acceptance but results
then in the appearance of the
b-anatmoi' mode

8.181 Post b-jivat' subjects
subjected to the intrusion of
a more favoured (m)Other by
a d-atmoi inducing {f}Other
flee though to the Oedipal
shore of b-jivat' through
an acknowledgement of the
rejecting (m/f)Others and
an acceptance of the
unacceptable Self

8.182 Likewise with b-jivat'
subjects exposed to such an
intrusion by a b-atmoi inducing
{f}Other figure they flee then
to the Oedipal shore of a
d-jivat' subject through an
acknowledgement of the
rejecting (m/f)Others and
an acceptance of the
divided Self

8.183 Post b-jivat' subjects
on the otherhand exposed
to the intrusion of a more
favoured (m)Other
by a domineering
d-anatmoi inducing
{f}Other precipitates their
flight then to the Oedipal
shore of b-jivatmoi' through
a rejection of the rejecting
(m/f)Others and an acceptance
of an isolated Self

8.184 Post b-jivat' subjects
originally exposed to
the intrusion of a more
favoured (m)Other by
a b-anatmoi inducing
(f)Other flee to the Oedipal
shore of d-jivatmoi'

8.19 Any exposure to the
withdrawal and transference
of this favouring look of the
(m)Other's upon the rival {f}Other
re-introduces banatmoi' and heralds
the arrival of the d-anatmoi'.''
mode and an Oedipal Mu'.''
second turning

8.20 The re-adoption of Self
in the context of the look of
preferential acceptance of
such a favoured {f}Other
precipitates then the
d-atmoi'.'' mode

8.21 A d-Littling withdrawal of
this look of acceptance by some
self favouring narcissistic
{f}Other forces a return then
to the d-anatmoi'.'' mode

8.22  Repeated withdrawal of this
belittling look of of acceptance by
by some d-Littling self-favouring
{f}Other and by it's transference
onto some sibling rival sidelines
the speaking subject into
the b-atmoi'.'' position

8.23 If the favoured {f}Other's
look of accepting approval had
been won and lost though in the
blink of a "castrating" eye then
the d-anatmoi'.'' mode
is hastily re-entered

8.24  Repeated withdrawal of this
lookof approving acceptance by
such a domineering {f}Other
and by it's transference onto
some sibling rival sidelines
the speaking subject
into a domineered
b-atmoi'.'' position

8.25 The pushing of a far
more tolerant non-domineering
{f}Other to their limit likewise
results in the loss of this look of
approving acceptance but results
then in the appearance of the
b-anatmoi'.'' mode

8.26 Post b-jivat' subjects
subjected to the intrusion of
a more favoured {f}Other figure
by a d-atmoi inducing {f}Other
favoured (m)Other figure
flee then to the Oedipal
shore of b-jivat'.'' through
an acknowledgement of the
rejecting (m/f)Others and
an acceptance of the
unacceptable Self

8.27 Likewise with b-jivat'
subjects exposed to such an
intrusion by a b-atmoi' inducing
da favoured (m)Other figure
they flee then to the Oedipal
shore of a d-jivat'.'' subject
through an acknowledgement
of the rejecting (m/f)Others
and an acceptance of the
divided Self

8.28 Again any post b-jivat'
subject exposed at this
point to the intrusion of a
more favoured {f}Other figure
by a domineering d-anatmoi'
inducing {f}Other favoured
(m)Other figure precipitates
a flight to the Oedipal
shore of b-jivatmoi'.''
through a rejection of
the rejecting (m/f)Others
and an acceptance
of an isolated Self

8.29 Post b-jivat' subjects
originally exposed to
the intrusion of a more
favoured {f}Other by
a b-anatmoi inducing
{f}Other favoured (m)Other
figure flee to the Oedipal
shore of d-jivatmoi'.''

9.00 Thus these eight-fold
paths of the mind may well
represent the absolute limits
of change possible for any
speaking being

10.00 Beyond only lies
deathly silence